In the modern world, it is possile to shop, work, and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with. Is it a positive or negative development in you opinion?
Over the past few decades, the world has seen an upsurge in the trend of people depending on the internet in every aspect of their lives, from shopping to working. It seems to me that, the benefits obtained from this tendency outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why reliance on the internet has ample harmful effects on the public’s life. First of all, the over-dependance on the internet results in the inadequate communicative ability, which exists prevalent in recent years. This will be proven by looking at young generation, young adults who only immerse themselves into social media excessively would face a range of dilemmas when integrating into an unfamiliar environment, especially workplace, owing to the lack of social skills. Secondly, without face-to-face connection, it would possibly give rise to a society with neither empathy nor compassion, which is due to an increase in detachment levels. Thus, it can be concluded that the downsides of this tendency is incontrovertible.
On the other hand, I contend that the internet is an invaluable communication tool. To begin with, thanks to the technological revolution, every member of society is now able to keep in touch with their relationships worldwide, which considerably contributes to enhance globalization. On top of that, working online is not only less time-consuming but also highly effective simultaneously, which does play a vital factor in the companies’ measures to boost the productivity of their workers along with company’s revenue. Staff working online are adopted to reasearch and refine a variety of information as much as those working at the office, thereby companies can obliterate the expenditure on office’s rent, for instance. All in all, it would be argued that this trend provides various beneficial impacts on the society.
In conclusion, it is my personal belief that the potential benefits of the reliance on the internet are more significant than the possible dangers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36477987421 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23469825696 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2084603135 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.230769231 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1740007104 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522235059497 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465676045267 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859424270776 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382118751415 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.