The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information about oil production and usage in China for a period of 24 years that is from 1982 to 2006.
Overall, although both utilization and production were at the same level at the beginning, consumption of oil outweighed production by the end of the period.
Looking at consumption, in 1982, 2 million barrels of oil were used and the rates remained same until 1990 where there was a rapid surge in the consumption reaching to around 3.8 million barrels in 1994. This trend continued and consumption increased drastically to 4 million and 5 million barrels in 1998 and 2002 respectively. Similarly, by the end of the period consumption was recorded to be approximately 6.5 million barrels, which was the highest among all the years.
With regards to production, in 1982, it was same as that of consumption (2 million barrels). However, it did not undergo the same trend. In 1986, 3 million barrels of oil were produced and the numbers continued till 1998. After which, there was a slight increase to about 3.2 million barrels and remained the same till 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | view | |
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ption increased drastically to 4 million and 5 million barrels in 1998 and 2002 r...
^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...els of oil were produced and the numbers continued till 1998. After which, there ...
^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch, there was a slight increase to about 3.2 million barrels and remained the sam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88648648649 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82370224625 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7797517885 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163913539625 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764207547024 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800245845756 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132696125801 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879765693691 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.