The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph is an illustration of oil production and consumption in China between the year 1982 and 2006. Units are measured in millions of barrels per day.
Overall, oil consumption in China increased steadily and exceeded production within the study. There was also minimal increase in production within the given period (1982 to 2006).
In the first year, 1982, oil production was at a little over 2 million barrels per day. And by the year 1986, oil production in China stood at exactly 3 million barrels per day. This figure remained the same till the end of 1994. By 1998, oil production has exceeded 3 million barrels per day, but it was still under 4 million barrels. Although noticeable increase was seen in oil production in the remaining year, 4 million barrels output was not achieved.
On the other hand, oil consumption was around 2 million barrels from the first year until 1990. Afterwards, there was a rise in oil consumption throughout the given period (oil consumption stood at over 6 million barrels per day in the final year, about two times that of production).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64679991207 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8759312207 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3636363636 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191969737372 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106795847907 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105710482454 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170925586648 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835195708845 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.