Ever since the dawn of time, humans have been finding a host of methods to achieve and maintain good health. These days, more people are inclined to count deeply on doctors and medication instead of pursuing a healthy lifestyle. I totally espouse this notion due to these following reasons.
To begin with, many people are so preoccupied with their work every day to make a good living that they are too lethargic and lazy to lead a healthy life. This is because they are very weary of their hectic schedules. According to a survey, many Japanese officers tend to use their weekends sleeping at home or have to join wine parties with their superiors to cement their bonding. This indicates the reason why they cannot follow a good lifestyle.
Moreover, doctors and drugs play a paramount role in people’s lives. First, medical technology has undergone a tremendous evolution; therefore, nowadays, many diseases can be diagnosed and cured by visiting doctors or consuming the medicine. For example, back to thousand years ago, smallpox took a toll on a vast population of the world, however, it is curable thanks to medicine and healthcare now. Second, it is obvious that people who suffer from incurable diseases such as HIV, AIDS and cancer may need to visit their doctors and take medicine on a daily basis to prolong their lives.
In conclusion, human well-being is now based on doctors and chemical medicine. However, I believe that they should both consult medical experts, take medicine and promote a healthy lifestyle
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ming the medicine. For example, back to thousand years ago, smallpox took a toll on a va...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...medicine and promote a healthy lifestyle
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03137254902 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55899706421 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6613821243 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6923076923 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263039580251 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787773252367 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393193061805 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138977161347 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251168791995 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.