The line graph depicts the amount of oil produced and consumed in China from 1982 to 2006. The unit is measured in millions of oil barrels per day.
Overall, it is evident that there was an upward trend in the two factors in the given period of time, yet the oil consumption rose at a faster rate than the oil production.
As can be seen from the graph, in the first year of the observed time span, China's oil consumption and production were virtually identical, with 1.9 and 2.1 million barrels respectively. Besides, the period between 1986 and 1990 witnessed a gap of 1 millions of oil barrels between the oil supply and demand, of 3 million and 2 million in turn.
It is noticeable that in 1994, the quantity of the oil consumption on a daily basis in China surpassed that of the oil production, at 3.5 million and 3 million of oil barrels each. Moreover, during 12 years from 1994, a dramatic growth of 2.7 million barrels is recorded for the consumed oil whereas the figures for production of oil slightly increased by 0.5 million.
Hi there! Many students look…
Hi there! Many students look for a place where to buy an informal essay and I want to share a few tips on how to find a good writing company. Don't be afraid to ask questions. Try to find customers' feedback and use for that different sources. Compare the prices with different writing companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d trend in the two factors in the given period of time, yet the oil consumption rose at a fast...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...etween 1986 and 1990 witnessed a gap of 1 millions of oil barrels between the oil supply and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, moreover, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60962566845 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59011290008 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4986850232 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31207333712 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16573308474 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980015788834 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204042163009 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077363003011 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.