The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph shows the proportion of tourists, who visited four different Brighton’s tourist sports between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of tourists visiting pavilion and pier has increased over the period. The visitors deciding to go to art gallery has decreased dramatically over the recorded time, whilest the proportions of festival goers, despite some fluctuations, stay steadily throughout the period.
The tourists visiting pavilion has increased sharply from around 23% to 48% during 1980 and 1995. Then it declined to reach just above 30% in 2010. The trend for art gallery was similar to pavilion. It increased from 22% to 37% during the period of 1980 and 1985. Then it started decreasing dramatically and reached just below 10% in 201 0.
The percentage of pier visitors fluctuated for 20 years from 1980 to 2000, before increasing to reach around 22% in 2010. The festival visitors decreased from 30% to 25%. The trend continued until 1995 and then increased for next five years and reached around 27% and stayed steadily for the last 10 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...val visitors decreased from 30% to 25%. The trend continued until 1995 and then inc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1546961326 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67454677502 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0580892289 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177160868839 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699672026482 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130249407353 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152750539982 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177542337028 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.