The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010.
The presented line graph provides a comparison of the proportion of people to Scotland visiting four different spots: Aquarium, Castle, Zoo and Festival between 1980 and 2010.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited Castle and Zoo showed an upward trend, whereas a reserve pattern could be observed in the figure for Aquarium and Festival.
In 1980, the ratio of visitors in Scotland was highest, at exactly 30%, while the respective figures for Castle and Aquarium were lower, at roughly 23% and 20%. People who paid a visit to the Zoo, however, accounted for the lowest number, at a mere 10%.
After reaching a peak of 45% in 1995, the statistics of tourists in Scotland witnessed an exponential decline to 35% in 2000, prior to remaining stable for the next 10 years. It is also noticeable that there was a substantial fluctuation during the period from 1980 to 2000 in the data of who visited the zoo, and this was followed by a significant climb of 10% to the last year of the survey. By contrast, Aquarium’s rate of attendants attracted a considerable decrease of 15% to 2010 after a serious variability of 10% can be experienced in 1995. It is interesting to note that the 30-year period from 1980 to 2010 saw a steady fall of 10% in the figure for the festival.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the figure for Aquarium and Festival. In 1980, the ratio of visitors in Scotla...
^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for the lowest number, at a mere 10%. After reaching a peak of 45% in 1995, th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d a considerable decrease of 15% to 2010 after a serious variability of 10% can b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76394849785 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76595374172 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562231759657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.8312074277 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321143864281 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127200234801 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847384887792 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195281056861 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813226731664 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.