The line graph depicts records about the average amount of carbon dioixde released per person in the U K Sweden Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 over a 40 year period

Essay topics:

The line graph depicts records about the average amount of carbon dioixde released per person in the U.K, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 over a 40-year period.

The line graph depicts records about the average amount of carbon dioixde released per person in the U.K, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 over a 40-year period.

Overall, it is evident that the gap between four countries had narrowed. The United Kingdom and Sweden showed downward trends whereas Italy and Portugal contributed more to carbon dioxide emissions compared to the initial period.

Looking at the detail, with respect to the United Kingdom, the figure began at around 11 metric tonnes in 1967 and remained almost stable until 1977. Although the figure continued to decrease gradually and finished at just under 9 metric tonnes, the United Kingdom was still the most responsible for carbon dioxide emissions among the four countries. In the initial period, Sweden suddenly rose upwards to its peak at approximately 11 metric tonnes in 1977, but it plummeted to over 5 metric tonnes in 2007 which is the same as Portugal.

Both Italy and Portugal showed similar trends. Although Italy began at just above 4 metric tonnes, it continnued to increase to just over 6 metric tonnes in 1998 and finally overtook the figure of Sweden. The figure levelled off until 2007. Portugal was the most marginal contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, starting at slightly more than 1 metric tonnes in 1967, but soared more than three times to approximately 5 metric tonnes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...nificant facts to emerge are that two U.K and Sweden had the same downward trend....
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81339712919 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5877073795 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1427012511 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235623044928 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11451934183 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838590093781 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183915024341 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978084237173 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.