The Line Graph Gives Information About Land Used For Organic Crops In Two Countries From 1985 To 2010

Essay topics:

The Line Graph Gives Information About Land Used For Organic Crops In Two Countries From 1985 To 2010.

The land used for organic crops in two nations has been depicted by given line graph from 1985 to 2010.

One glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that maximum land for organic food had been used by Country A in middle years rather than Country B.

It is clear that in 1985, approximately 25 hectare land was used by both nations.Whereas from 1985 to 1990,there was an increase in the usage of land, which was 60 hectare by Country A and 30 hectare by Country B and in 1995,the land used for organic food was witnessed at approximately 160 hectare by Countrie B and below 150 hectare by Country B.

Moving further,in 2000, the land used by Country A had peak value at 280 hectare but after that the usage of land started declining and from 2005 to 2010 there was a rapid decline and reached at 150 hectare.In Country B, land usage was going down after 2000 year and in 2010 it was witnessed at 150 hectare, which was similar to country A.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (14 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...5 hectare land was used by both nations.Whereas from 1985 to 1990,there was an increas...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd was used by both nations.Whereas from 1985 to 1990,there was an increase in th...
^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
...ease in the usage of land, which was 60 hectare by Country A and 30 hectare by Country ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
...hich was 60 hectare by Country A and 30 hectare by Country B and in 1995,the land used ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
...food was witnessed at approximately 160 hectare by Countrie B and below 150 hectare by...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
...160 hectare by Countrie B and below 150 hectare by Country B. Moving further,in 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tare by Countrie B and below 150 hectare by Country B. Moving further,in 200...
^^
Line 13, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ctare by Country B. Moving further,in 2000, the land used by Country A had pe...
^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
...used by Country A had peak value at 280 hectare but after that the usage of land starte...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 200, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
... was a rapid decline and reached at 150 hectare.In Country B, land usage was going down...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...apid decline and reached at 150 hectare.In Country B, land usage was going down af...
^^
Line 13, column 300, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hectare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hectares'.
Suggestion: hectares
...ear and in 2010 it was witnessed at 150 hectare, which was similar to country A.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41011235955 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39616455933 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.134860512 43.030603864 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.25 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380333624749 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301039548705 0.103423049105 291% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165052505762 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301039548705 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165052505762 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.2 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.19 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.