The line graph shows burglaries per thousand vehicles in four countries between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows burglaries per thousand vehicles in four countries between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates data on burglaries occurs in Great Britain, Greece, Spain, and Norway from 2000 to 2009.

It is notable burglaries in Great Britain were higher than other countries while this rate had increased in Greece since 2005.

According to the graph, 20 thousand were burglaries in Great Britain in 2006 while this rate was from 5 to 12 per thousand in Greece, Spain, and Norway.

In great Britain vehicles, burglaries were 20 thousand in 2002 and steadily decrease to 15 thousand in 2004 but then reach to 20 thousand in 2006. finally, the rate had fallen again to 15 thousand in 2008.

Vehicles burglaries had sharply reduced from 2005 to 2009 (14 to 4 per thousand respectively) in Spain. In contrast, vehicles burglaries increase during 2005 to 2009 from 9 to 13 per thousand respectively.

In Norway vehicles burglaries had the stable rate of 5 thousand from 2003 to 2007; however, in 2007 rate jumps to 6 thousand.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
... but then reach to 20 thousand in 2006. finally, the rate had fallen again to 15 thousa...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92546583851 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66891453937 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8163620914 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216735692287 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119823675533 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517043154814 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127998020321 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510783250572 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.