The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams.
The given line graph illustrates the sales of gold in Dubai between january to december of the year 2002 in millions of dirhems.
Overall, from the graph it is clear that gold sales peaked during march 2002 and had two major falls in sales during July and september of 2002, but the sale was stable and almost similar during the starting and ending of the year.
In the starting month of the year :gold sales was at 200 millions od dirhems (m), which rose slightly to about 220 m by the second month. then there was a sudden rise in the gold sale peaking to 350 m by march, then there was a sudden down fall in april to reach 250 m. the downwards trend followed in the subsequent months and there was a decrease of 50 m every month to reach almost 100m by July 2002 which was the last lowest figure in sales for that year. following this fall there was a slight upwards trend which pushed the sales to above 200m by august, unfortunately the sales dipped again in september to a similar levels seen in July just above 100m. By october the sales stabilised just below 200m which was sustained till the year end in december almost reaching similar figures seen in the starting of the year 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...tly to about 220 m by the second month. then there was a sudden rise in the gold sal...
^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...t lowest figure in sales for that year. following this fall there was a slight upwards tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'level'?
Suggestion: level
... dipped again in september to a similar levels seen in July just above 100m. By octobe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39189189189 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12544366051 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8139281539 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268817680904 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151265467443 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098671762177 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235259544945 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083551572345 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.