The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year

The given line graph shows the earning of four cafes in New York. These figures in the line graph are divided into four groups including the tea room, internet express, wi-fi cafe and cafe cool. Overall, it can be seen from the line graph that the tea room is the highest income and wi-fi café is ranked in the second.
In January, the income of the tea room was the highest among four groups while the cafe cool was the lowest. However, after 6 months, the money the tea room got fluctuated significantly. This figure declined suddenly in February and reached the highest point of approximately 180.000 dollars in March, after which it decreased steadily to more than 130.000 dollars in July. In this stage, the income of cafe cool fell slightly in February and rose again in May, followed by a steady increase to approximately 40.000 dollars in July. From July to December, there was a sharp fall in the income of the tea room. This figure went down from more than 130.000 dollars to about 50.000 dollars, while the figure of cafe cool picked up considerable to 120.000 dollars.
Turning to the two remaining groups, in January, the income of internet express and WiFi cafe were 100.000 dollars and about 50.000 dollars respectively. After 6 months, the earning of internet express dropped gradually to 80.000 dollars, while that of WiFi cafe was two as much as that of 6 months ago. From July to September, there was a decline in WiFi cafe. However, in this stage, the income of internet express increased gradually. In the last 3 months of the year, the money WiFi cafe earned rose suddenly to more than 180.000 dollars in December and that internet express earned jumped up to 140.000 dollars in this month

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 300.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71666666667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35838692519 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436666666667 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6531435154 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232299222159 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105777549792 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133615122985 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191963802706 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140507534656 0.0819641961636 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.