The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph shows the figures of consumption of fast food by teenagers living in Australia from 1975 to 2000. These figures are classified according to kind of food. Overall, it can be seen from the line graph that consumption of hamburgers is the highest and consumption of fish and chips is the lowest.
In 1975, teenagers living in Australia tended to eat fish and chips so this figure reached the highest point of 100 number of times eaten per year. However, this figure declined to more than 80 number of times eaten in 1980 and rose again in 1985. From 1985 to 2000, the number of people eating fish and chips decreased suddenly to approximately 40 times of eaten in 2000
On the other hand, in 1975, there were few people eating pizza and hamburgers so the number of times eaten per year of them are more 9 times and appropriately 10 times respectively. However, in 1985, number of times people eating hamburgers and pizza picked up more than 80 times and approximately 82 times respectively. From 1985 to 2000, there was a increase in number of times eaten hamburgers per year (more than 100 times in 2000) while, that of pizza stayed unchanged with approximately 82 times
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...pectively. From 1985 to 2000, there was a increase in number of times eaten hambu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66507177033 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59535750694 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444976076555 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2783109999 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101146496856 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710148924442 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927731775443 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973632784027 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799647294109 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.