The line graph shows the number of immigrants who obtained UK citizenship between 1962 and 2002 and the bar chart gives a breakdown of the number in 1996 and 2002 according to the continents they came from Summarize the information by selecting and report

Essay topics:

The line graph shows the number of immigrants who obtained UK citizenship between 1962 and 2002, and the bar chart gives a breakdown of the number in 1996 and 2002 according to the continents they came from.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph and column chart illustrate trends in the number of citizens and immigrants among them in the Great Britain.
Overall, as can be seen from the first graph, the citizenship in the UK underwent moderate growth during the period of forty years, interrupted with marginal fall between 1972 and 1982. The total quantity of immigrants was increased by 42 thousand people, with majority of Asian immigrants.
Turning to the first decade of surveyed period, we notice that the number of citizens went up from twenty thousand in 1962 to almost 37 thousand in 1972. Then suddenly, level of population fell down slightly and hovered around 30 thousand. During the remainder of the period, the population growth was rather significant, closing the 1992 year up to 50 thousand people. And in the end of researched period, it was above one hundred and ten thousand.
This noticeable rise in population was accompanied with the gradual growth in percentage correlation of immigrants. From 1996 to 2002 the number of immigrants from Europe and Africa increased most dramatically, by 18 and 16 thousand people respectively. The number of Asian immigrants counted almost a half of immigrants by the end of 2002 and equals to 58 thousand. The least number of residents have American, Australian and other origins: during 7 years their amount decreased by one thousand (from 5 to 4 th. people).

Votes
Average: 1.1 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05217391304 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81134617164 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0832376249 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0253917596789 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0101361024205 0.103423049105 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023540387191 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0235400437003 0.15604864568 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254833977127 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05217391304 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81134617164 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0832376249 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0253917596789 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0101361024205 0.103423049105 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023540387191 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0235400437003 0.15604864568 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254833977127 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.