The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main fatures and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how the tea leaves are processed in order to manufacture both loose tea and tea bags.
Overall, the diagram shows that before tea becomes appropriate for everyday consumption, it forced to undergo several procedures and treatments. The manufacture process is rather sophisticated, and it requires the special proficiency.
In the initial stages in the process, tea leaves have to be picked up, regarding the fact that only bud (two top leaves) is collected for manufacture high quality tea. Secondly, leaves are subject to withering, by the process of air passing through them on the rack, where the tea leaves are initially moisture out by 60%.
In the next phase of the process, the producers have to opt for appropriate method for manufacture: traditional way suggests the loose tea on the output, whereas modern method is used for tea bags production. In the case of traditional method, the major technique that is used is rolling, that ends up with leaves rolled flat and broken. This way is beneficial because of enzymes released from the leaves. What follows is different, modern method involves cutting tea leaves before making them torn and curled, and after this, the purified leaves are quickly molded into small granular pieces and submerged into bags. The ultimate stages involve oxidation process, where rolled leaves are spread on the flat cement or tile surface to be treated by mixture of enzymes and air in order to saturate them with cooper color. In the end of manufacturing, almost ready for consumption tea is fired and dried in high temperatures, treating with aroma and flavors. Totally, 97% of moisture is particularly extracted out of the leaves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11231884058 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72872756175 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547101449275 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0022736794 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193740506239 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661069276269 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570816275826 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123966506354 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378199844536 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.