The plans below show the layout of university’s sport center now, and how t will look after redevelopment.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the proposals of reconstruction of sport complex in the university where will be added many new sport and entertainment facilities.
Overall, in the future planners want to enlarge sport complex on the east and west, where two outdoor courts will make way for new swimming pool, extra changing rooms and rooms for dance classes.
First of all, constructors propose to expand gym to the south-east of complex, that might allow to add more sport equipment for clients. Moreover, in the east part of center we see two proposed dance halls, which will be distinguished with sports hall by narrow corridor. Just after the entrance by the right hand the tiny cosy café will be located next to new changing room.
The central part of university’s sport complex will not undergo any changes: After rounded reception there are middle-sized swimming pool (25 metres), changing room and seating area. Moving to the western, we notice that leisure pool will spring up for recreational activity and one extra changing room is added exactly in the southwest corner. All in all, I reckon, under these proposals, students’ needs will be better satisfied by adding to the sports complex extra convenient facilities and expanding the whole territory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: adding
...south-east of complex, that might allow to add more sport equipment for clients. Moreo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, i reckon, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14146341463 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71977358473 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624390243902 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5260297798 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140460428587 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697132245401 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376891032633 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100733064716 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255386612278 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.