The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
The graph depicts about how oil consumed and producted in China for a period of 24 years from 1982 to 2006. It can be seen that the amount of oil production and consumption in some periods in China experienced a relatively stability, especially in oil production, although it still had a period of fluctuation, there was not so much. By contrast, the oil consumption in China saw a significant increase in the 12-year period.
Analyzing more the detail, the oil production stood at 2 millions of oil barrels per day in 1982 but just 4 years later, this figure reached 3 millions per day. At the same time, China’s oil consumption was roughly equivalent to that of oil product, reaching 1.9 millions per day. This parity was also witnessed in 1993 when both the oil consumption and production was 3 millions, a slight growth after a period of the volatility of both figures before.
In contrast, looking at the line shows the oil consumption in China, there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 when the figure grew up 6.2 millions per day in the last period and was three times that of it in 1982. When compared to the amount of oil produced during this period, it seems that the consumption of the Chinese people is much higher.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a period of 24 years from 1982 to 2006 It can be seen that the amount of oil pr...
^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('relatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('stability') instead of another adjective.
...on in some periods in China experienced a relatively stability especially in oil production although i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignificant increase in the 12year period Analyzing more the detail the oil produc...
^^^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
... the detail the oil production stood at 2 millions of oil barrels per day in 1982 but just 4 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsumption and production was 3 millions a slight growth after a period of the vo...
^^
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the volatility of both figures before In contrast looking at the line shows th...
^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the oil consumption in China there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 whe...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('remarkably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
... the oil consumption in China there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 when the figure grew ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umption in China there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 when the figure ...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and was three times that of it in 1982 When compared to the amount of oil produ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61898267423 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495454545455 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 220.0 22.4926829268 978% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 995.0 112.824112599 882% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 220.0 22.9334400587 959% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 43.0 5.23603664747 821% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392283312795 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.392283312795 0.103423049105 379% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2802650013 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636656706559 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 109.9 13.2329268293 831% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -126.44 61.2550243902 -206% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 85.5 10.3012195122 830% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.42 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.35 8.06136585366 215% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 90.0 10.9970731707 818% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 90.0 11.0658536585 813% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a period of 24 years from 1982 to 2006 It can be seen that the amount of oil pr...
^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('relatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('stability') instead of another adjective.
...on in some periods in China experienced a relatively stability especially in oil production although i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignificant increase in the 12year period Analyzing more the detail the oil produc...
^^^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
... the detail the oil production stood at 2 millions of oil barrels per day in 1982 but just 4 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsumption and production was 3 millions a slight growth after a period of the vo...
^^
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the volatility of both figures before In contrast looking at the line shows th...
^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the oil consumption in China there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 whe...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('remarkably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
... the oil consumption in China there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 when the figure grew ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umption in China there was an remarkably climb from 1990 to 2006 when the figure ...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and was three times that of it in 1982 When compared to the amount of oil produ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61898267423 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495454545455 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 220.0 22.4926829268 978% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 995.0 112.824112599 882% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 220.0 22.9334400587 959% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 43.0 5.23603664747 821% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392283312795 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.392283312795 0.103423049105 379% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2802650013 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636656706559 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 109.9 13.2329268293 831% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -126.44 61.2550243902 -206% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 85.5 10.3012195122 830% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.42 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.35 8.06136585366 215% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 90.0 10.9970731707 818% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 90.0 11.0658536585 813% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.