The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The layouts illustrate the changes of the way to get into a city hospital from 2001 to 2010. It can be clearly seen that the most noticeable change is the appearance of two roundabout and new facilities such as bus station and staff car park.
Looking at the two maps, the city hospital was surrounded by the ring road. In 2007, there were six bus stops which appeared along the two sides of the hospital road but the three bus stops on the right were located in the staff and public car park. However, the public car park was separated and moved to a position adjacent to the city hospital in 2010’s map.
On the other hand, in 2010, a roundabout appeared at the intersection of the ring road and the hospital road while at the crossroad between the city road and hospital road, another roundabout was also constructed. In addition, a new bus station was built up in the west and linked with the two roundabouts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s such as bus station and staff car park Looking at the two maps the city hospita...
^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
... position adjacent to the city hospital in 2010s map On the other hand in 2010 a round...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jacent to the city hospital in 2010s map On the other hand in 2010 a roundabout a...
^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...west and linked with the two roundabouts
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40718562874 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40132452962 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 167.0 22.4926829268 742% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 736.0 112.824112599 652% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 167.0 22.9334400587 728% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 76.0 5.23603664747 1451% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210644697822 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210644697822 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144766652346 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042080750455 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 82.8 13.2329268293 626% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -72.65 61.2550243902 -119% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.9 10.3012195122 630% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.48 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.09 8.06136585366 175% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 68.8 10.9970731707 626% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.