The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the millions of dollar of four different finances for a native dominance from the past and make an estimated outcome in New Zealand over a period of 10 years from 2012 to 2022 and projected year in 2030.
Overall, it is immediately apparent from the line graph that increases and decreases as millions of dollars from the four several categories and keeps predictions of the upward trend observed in the two major departments are rates revenue and user charges.
At the beginning of the period, in 2012, the rates revenue accounted for nearly $1400 million whereas this trend climbed upwards and finances reached with shares $2000 million in 2020 and this revenue would be surged up at above $500 million in the ending financial year of 2030. However, the term of user charges follows the same trend as rates revenue with shares of $1000 million. Over the next five years, the funds for local regimes crossed the barrier, which accounted for $1500 million and skyrocketed would be assumed to approximately more than $2000 million in the ending year of June 30.
Furthermore, borrowings are the most fluctuated finance department for authority in New Zealand which accounted at below $1000 million in 2012 and slightly got inclined by $100- $200 million after two years but drastically plummeted at $600 million and went in free fall for next six years and reached $800 million in 2022 and projected would be the same value on June 30. It s interesting to note that grants and subsidies have the least number of finances in New Zealand, with a low value at $400 million and remaining unchanged until 2015 with shares of $700 million and a predicted $500 million after eight years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rates'' or 'rate's'?
Suggestion: rates'; rate's
...e beginning of the period, in 2012, the rates revenue accounted for nearly 400 millio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77663230241 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5068204456 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508591065292 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3641584527 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 198.571428571 112.824112599 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.5714285714 22.9334400587 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123092956065 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671445684839 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541692107376 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908319614964 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556332588569 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.