The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand from 2012 to 30 June.
Generally, rates revenue and user charges climb gradually over the years. Different from the the ones mentioned, the borrowings, grants and subsidies have rapid changes in the century.
With a humble beginning of almost 1500 million dollars, it is clearly being illustrated that rates revenue gradually raise throughout the period and earn the highest proportion of finance every year. In parallel, user charges are slightly below rates revenue and follow along the uprate of it to settle at about 2000 million dollars.
The graph clearly points out that borrowings as well as grants and subsidies witness many ups and downs. Borrowings started off at just above the 750 million dollars mark and rocketed up to about 1200 million dollars in 2014, then after series of downfalls and uprises, it managed to end up with approximately 750 million dollars in 2022. Grants and subsidies kicked off with the lowest amount of 400 million dollars and increased to 750 million dollars in 2016, with a gradual reduction, it finally stopped at 500 million dollars.
With all the current information, rates revenue and user charges are predicted to keep climbing. Grants and subsidies are most likely to continue falling, in contrast, borrowings could potentially have a sharp growth in number.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...radually over the years. Different from the the ones mentioned, the borrowings, grants ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...radually over the years. Different from the the ones mentioned, the borrowings, grants ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13596491228 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55009444662 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4053640812 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875910408213 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513311202538 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135454880495 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964239092094 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180019476643 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.