The line graph compares the financial turnover of a local authority in New Zealand among a period of 10 years.
It is clear that the Rates revenue and User charges saw a constant trend of raises during the period, however, the Borrowings saw a tolerance. Moreover, Grants and Subsidies was almost at a constant level.
The graph shows that at the beginning of the decade which means 2012, the Rates revenue was about 1500 million dollars and stood stable until 2013 and after that, it began an increasing trend to rich the anticipating amount of 2500 million dollars in 2022. Furthermore, the User charges financial rate rose from the start of the period (2012) and it is estimated to climb with almost a constant trend until 2022 and rich to 2000 million dollars.
As regards, the rate of Borrowings experienced a wide variety of increase and decreases which started from about 800 million dollars at 2012, anticipating to saw a peak of 1400 million dollars in 2020, saw a falling into 800 million again and remain stable until 2022, however, the Grants and subsidies remained almost stable until 2015, then, saw a rise to approximate amount of 800 million in 2016 and a fall to near amount of 600 million in 2017 and it will stand in an almost same level (500 million dollars) until 2022.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, then, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73451327434 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43232467094 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491150442478 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.836556135 43.030603864 351% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.333333333 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.6666666667 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0728169402409 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653749788069 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123586849412 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939052008143 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141854576444 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.