The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
The line graph demonstrate noticiable witness records. 1000 vehicales theffs by thefts in different nation between 1990 to 1999.
Overall, It is clearly depicted the rate of thefts vehical was highest in Great Britin over the given prioded and minor change occurred in three different political territory.
In the begganing, The rate of cars thefts 19% in England it was more-than two times twised compare to other three nations in 1990, and it was varied and picked minor changed and stopped at 18% in the 1999. While 3 other countries rates were strated lowest point 9% , 7% and 6% for Sweden,Canada and France respectively.
In 1991, Although France and Sweden reached same level 9%. After that the rates of transportation thefted in Sweden dramatically grow up and piked 14% in the 1999. While the rates in France was gradually decline and reached 6% in the last year. Nevertheless, Canada maintain same level over the decade it was 6%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'strated the lowest'.
Suggestion: strated the lowest
...999. While 3 other countries rates were strated lowest point 9% , 7% and 6% for Sweden,Canada ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tries rates were strated lowest point 9% , 7% and 6% for Sweden,Canada and France ...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Canada
...d lowest point 9% , 7% and 6% for Sweden,Canada and France respectively. In 1991, Alt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96835443038 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64740282972 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3758711593 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163903077939 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712137634854 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757501918695 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116636490729 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103658075656 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.