many things that used to be done in the home by hand are now being done by machine.
does it development bring more advantage or disadvantage?
There are many machines in the home have an impact on people living and developed it. The machines decrease the time of the people at home, but the machines have some active trouble in the future.
Firstly, one of the machine's advantages develops people life because machines can decrease the effects of the work. People rely on machines rather than themselves as they don not want to get hard work at home. Therefore, machines are reduced by the time of people. For instance, washing machines can decrease people’s time since people in previous time could wash their clothes by their hand.
Secondly, in my opinion, machines enhance people life to be better than the previous time because they can do any things people need to do rather than the effect of people and less of the cost. Thus, people improve their machines to be work hard and without any effect of people after made of machine. For example, in the world, the industries are worked by machine instead of people.
On the contrary, the people who rely on machines at home will not be well in the future since the machines reduce the effects of people. People require more effective to be active in their life. Therefore, the machines are harmful the people in the future. For example, some people who are old now they are not feeling happy since they are not active due to machines.
To sum up, as stated above, machines develop and enhance people life in the home such a washing machine. On the other hand, the machines increase the inactive people because of depending on machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have some active trouble in the future. Firstly, one of the machines advantages ...
^^^
Line 6, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce they are not active due to machines. To sum up, as stated above, machines dev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77121771218 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29836281816 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435424354244 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1627477427 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 5.23603664747 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122214138158 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558007934447 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438968563645 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861891233262 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210769365339 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.