The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
Given are the two maps delineating the physical modifications of a coastal area in Darwin during a phase of 5 years, commencing in 2009.
Perceptibly, the core alterations happened mainly in the south of the region where it experienced a shift away from heavily serving the industry to education purposes at length.
To the north of the provided maps, there were not myriad changes except for the eradication of the industrial area inside the circular footpath to make room for another new swimming pool that was adjacent to the original lake. Meanwhile, the other two swimming pools located along the seashore and other prominent facilities such as the school in the further northwest and the conventional center nearby still stayed unchanged over the years. Likewise, the fishing area was also kept since the year 2009 until 2014.
However, the story went different to the south of the coastal region as the whole space used to serve for the industrial area which was removed out of the town was filled with a wide range of plants and trees creating a green space, instead. Moreover, the area was further featured with the appearance of the new university building in the west along with another new-built residential building in the middle. Strikingly, a period of 5 years brought the presence of the new harbor erected in the southeast of the map on the sea, which was accessed by following a new footpath running from the west.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the physical m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, still, while, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90946502058 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62527573512 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59670781893 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0679694133 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.125 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123743231619 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581763604653 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511828053449 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799157968883 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476649594446 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.