The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarke
The sketched map of the town renowned as Garlsdon illustrates two distinct sighting where construction of a new supermarket (s) will be held.
In general, site one is to be located in Northern-West of the town which will have feasible access to railway and roadway. On the contrary, site two is to be constructed in a city centre that can be accessed by numerous households and industries. Anyhow, the first site is superior when space and accessibility is considered.
Site one, being located in the countryside will have no worries about car park. Also, it will have access of vehicles and trains for 39,000 citizens from two cities nearby namely, Hindon and Cransdon, located just around 12 and 25 Kilometer far respectively. Somehow, Bransdon with population of 15,000 might have problem travelling if not by train.
However, site two will have advantage as it is located right below the centre with access to all three regions nearby and it is comfortable for pupil of industries and housing to stop by, but the location has parking issues as this is no traffic zone. Although, people commuting via train will have the proper distance to shop from.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: Kilometers
...Cransdon, located just around 12 and 25 Kilometer far respectively. Somehow, Bransdon wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...king issues as this is no traffic zone. Although, people commuting via train will have t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9641025641 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77787823618 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635897435897 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2053707876 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186790024226 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755547516743 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801698515713 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131726361252 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866992669901 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.