The map below is the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarkets.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map below illustrates two different locations for building a supermarket in the town of Garlsdon named S1 and S2.
As it can be seen from the map, location S1 is on the west side of the countryside, which is noticeably spacious. In contrast, position S2 is placed in the middle of the town centre and also surrounded by the industry area and housing estate.
In the west of the countryside, area S1 has efficient transportation links as it is between the railway and the main roads. The most significant pro of this location for constructing is that its capacious space as it is placed in the countryside. Unfortunately, building a supermarket on this site may not be a good choice due to its inadequate population in the nearest area (10,000).
Meanwhile, location S2 is lying right in the centre of the town which can effortlessly attract both the residents living in the nearby housing estate and tourists. In addition, this position is also surrounded by the industry area, therefore there are definitely a lot of workers which means sales would not be a worry. However, noise does be a problem since there is a railway in front of position S2.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75124378109 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9618332376 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4158233354 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159979445331 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707668336817 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099678076617 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131811093375 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125432323042 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.