The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods (1962,1985 and present) Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pictogram illustrate the development that occurred at Meadowside village and Fonton town from the year 1962 to current year.

As can be seen from the maps, In 1962 Meadowside village is located in the western side of the Fonton town had only a small area and a narrow road cross through the village. By 1985 this thin road had expanded to main road and extended to east side to connect with Fonton town. Further more the land area of village enlarged to make way for leisure complex, housing estate and superstore. Now the Meadowside village had make over to suburbs the it is connected to Fonton town.

Similarly, In 1985 the land of Fonton town had developed while, the railway running through it remained constant during this 23 year period. But recently a new railway path originated from eastern side of Fonton two followed by a new railway station. Moreover a business park erected in the southern part of station with a linking road from main road in addition to that a hotel was constructed in the northern border of railway station.

Thus it is tangible from the pictogram the area of Meadowside village and Fonton town witnessed considerable change from 1962 to recent year.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...erstore. Now the Meadowside village had make over to suburbs the it is connected to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...owside village had make over to suburbs the it is connected to Fonton town. Similar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... two followed by a new railway station. Moreover a business park erected in the southern...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... northern border of railway station. Thus it is tangible from the pictogram the a...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, similarly, so, thus, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81642512077 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4866044066 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9519739493 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186454537485 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932968721034 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529940576311 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124235932438 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358312479471 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.