The map shows the ground floor of a library in 2001 and 2009.
The map gives information about the changes to a library's ground floor in 2009 compared to 2001.
Overall, even though the total area used for the ground floor of this particular library remained unchanged, there had been some major alterations done to the general layout of the floor.
In 2001, the librarian's desk and the stairs were located right next to the entrance, which was still kept the same in 2009. A long row of shelves on the left and at the back was dedicated to self-help, history and fiction books, respectively. On the right of the room, a medium shelf was used to store newspapers and periodicals. In the middle of the room, 8 square tables were utilized as a reading area.
A different picture was seen of this library's ground floor in 2009. The first major addition was a separate area for computers, which was right between the stairs and the reading area. The long shelf row on the left and at the back was rearranged in 2009, with the 3 main book types in 2001 being put only in the first 3 sections instead of taking up the whole row. Kitchen, economics, law and children's books respectively filled in the remaining spaces on the shelves. 4 rectangle tables were then used in place of 8 square tables, and films and DVDs were stored on the shelf next to the tables.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'librarians'' or 'librarian's'?
Suggestion: librarians'; librarian's
...al layout of the floor. In 2001, the librarians desk and the stairs were located right ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57939914163 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43549280252 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536480686695 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7310979106 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264768773162 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113683911895 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168147379789 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229090126908 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181706862558 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.