The maps below show and Island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

Essay topics:

The maps below show and Island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The given diagrams reveal the information about the some tourist facilities view on island before and after construction. It is very clear and coherent representation.

Overall, it is evident that in both diagram, there are huge difference. As we can see that, in the first diagram there are no any tourist facility while, in the second diagram it has been including so many facilities.

In the beginning, we can see that the first diagram which is the picture of the before construction. Therefore, no any single facility for the visitors. However, no any tourist come on that place. As well as, on that place only trees and see available for the travellers. So it is not attractive place for the tourists.

In the second diagram easily seen that picture is after construction. Firstly, in the boat facility for the visitors are available. However, the bridge made for the travellers. As well as, reach on the reception and Restaurant the track for vehicles are made. Moving ahead, for the visitors the arrangements of accommodation are done. Apart from that, on all Island the footpath is also set for the tourist for the walking. Moving ahead, the setup of swimming pool is very good on the side of beach. As a result
, the all facilities for visitor are avail on island.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...agrams reveal the information about the some tourist facilities view on island befor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ee that, in the first diagram there are no any tourist facility while, in the seco...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... of the before construction. Therefore, no any single facility for the visitors. H...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...gle facility for the visitors. However, no any tourist come on that place. As well...
^^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y good on the side of beach. As a result , the all facilities for visitor are ava...
^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...good on the side of beach. As a result , the all facilities for visitor are avai...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86757990868 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77941072297 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0064710943 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.7058823529 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8823529412 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13172044358 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415901805487 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695023959521 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949072906768 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739696991797 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.