The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selcting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The images show the contrasts in the center of Islip, a tiny town, between today and while it is being improved.
In general, several buildings will be developed within a future circular dual highway, while only the stores to the south of the main road will remain intact.
To begin, the local administration has chosen to build a dual highway around the town center, which is close to a school and residences, shortly. Currently, the school is not as large as it was planned, but it will be shortly. Furthermore, in order to make room for a new neighborhood, a section of the park will be removed, and the old housing areas will be relocated to another part of the city.
Despite this, the upper part of the town center will undergo several modifications in the future, such as the transformation of the main road into a pedestrian-only street or the local government's expansion of the center to the suburb. As a result, the area will soon be transformed into three huge structures: a bus station, a shopping mall, and a parking garage. Furthermore, when a tiny road connects to new homes close to the car park in the proposed development, people will have more options for living quarters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...o a pedestrian-only street or the local governments expansion of the center to the suburb. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74641148325 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84763369321 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5820898383 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0753279787767 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359239747637 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301088193561 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571871867513 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254710586943 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.