The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and the plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned maps highlight the differences between the current status of the Islip town centre and recommended designs for its further improvements.
Overall, the Islip town in future will be more development and convenience than the old one after the constructions of several facilities.
According to the map predicting the future improvement of the city, the most noticeable change will be the er construction of a dual carriageway surrounding the town with the oval shape. In addition, the Main road running from the West to the East will be transformed into the Pedestrian way. Besides, the shops lined along on the North side of the Main road will be replaced by amenities such as bus stop, parking lot and shopping centre.
As can be seen from the changes in the development of the future plan of Islip town, the rural area will be no longer present. There will be also a new housing area near to the car park which can be accessed by a minor road connecting this site with the dual carriageway. Furthermore, more accommodations will be constructed on the South side of the Pedestrian zone and the park will be narrowed to make way for this development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90688837075 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9488040676 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115894990666 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061956879281 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532974997345 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908668252026 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562594765229 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.