The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015
The maps illustrated the alternation in the university department's renovation plans for the ground floor in 2000 and 2005. In general, there were many dramatic changes in the plan for the ground floor of the university department during the period by building many various facilities. The number of conference rooms has also been significantly increased.
Looking at the map in 2000, the university department had only three seminar room separated by a corridor. Besides, there was a library and an office adjacent to the 3rd conference. The Eastern of the university department was almost completely vacant.
On the other hand, in 2005, the number of seminar rooms was increased to two rooms in the North opposite and adjacent to the second and third rooms. The size of the office was also expanded when merged with the library. Instead of that, the library was rebuilt in the Northern area and opposite the information technology center, separated with it by a corridor. Finally, a car park was also built in front of the university department near to the main entrance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms has also been significantly increased Looking at the map in 2000 the universit...
^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity department near to the main entrance
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, if, look, second, so, third, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99438202247 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7290941361 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 178.0 22.4926829268 791% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 889.0 112.824112599 788% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 178.0 22.9334400587 776% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 82.0 5.23603664747 1566% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27183973769 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.27183973769 0.103423049105 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20773994958 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148383616356 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 91.1 13.2329268293 688% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -109.19 61.2550243902 -178% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 72.7 10.3012195122 706% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.48 8.06136585366 192% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 11.4329268293 542% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 73.2 10.9970731707 666% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.