As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time.
Do you agree and disagree?
Nowadays, the advancement of science and technology is having significant impacts on human beings in every aspect of life, especially learning foreign language. It is said that communicating or translating foreign languages will become quickly and simple with a computer so learning them is not necessary. From my perspectives, I do not agree completely with this opinion because of a number of reasons.
To explaining my opinion, translation on computers is only suitable for common communicative texts, not conveying the exact meaning of academic texts. When using language translation applications on computers for English communication such as Google Translate, we cannot deny its accuracy, speed and convenience for partner. However, the application of computers to translate scientific and academic languages only makes us more time consuming. Therefore, we still need to learn a foreign language in order to use them more effectively.
On the other hand, learning a foreign language not only wastes time but also provides us with fascinating knowledge about the culture and citizens of the country. If your passion is discovering cultures all over the world, you need to study the language of the country to facilitate cultural research and exchange. For example, because of an extreme interest in British - American culture, I chose to major in English language at the Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam as my stopover. Although I have not really mastered this language, it also partly helped me expand my acquaintance of two outstanding cultures.
In short, in spite of convenience, we should reduce misusing computers to understand new vocabulary. Instead of that, discovering oversea languages system is beneficial for our ability to expand understanding as well as great opportunities in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecause of an extreme interest in British American culture I chose to major in Eng...
^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...ary Instead of that discovering oversea languages system is beneficial for our ability to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell as great opportunities in the future
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in short, such as, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38709677419 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.057148073 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598566308244 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 279.0 20.2975951904 1375% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1503.0 106.682146367 1409% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 279.0 20.7667163134 1343% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 134.0 7.06120827912 1898% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332277864746 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.332277864746 0.084324248473 394% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176346244653 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846791206368 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 143.5 13.0946893788 1096% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -228.63 50.2224549098 -455% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 114.5 11.3001002004 1013% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.46 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.06 8.58950901804 257% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.78957915832 644% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 113.6 10.1190380762 1123% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 10.7795591182 584% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.