The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate how the waterfront area of a town called Darwin transformed from 2009 to 2014.
To begin with, to the northwest of this area, there was a school in 2009 which stayed unchanged in 2014. Besides, the convention centre nearby remained the same after a 5-year period. According to the diagram, footpath surrounded the location of the lake, the area for trees and the industrial area in 2009. In 2014, the lake located in the northeast of this location remained constant. In the meantime, the trees still existed without any change in location or in size. In contrast, the industrial area adjacent to the lake made way for the swimming pool in 2014. In addition, two swimming pools situated next to this location underwent stability throughout the period shown. Another thing to add is that the fishing area positioned in the northeast corner experienced no change related to location or size.
As the diagrams suggest, along the east of this area, there was a harbour constructed in the south of the sea. Additionally, the industrial area was demolished to build up several things. In the middle of the layout of this area, residential building was expanded in 2014. Furthermore, there was a university building erected to the west of the residential buildings. Toward the south of residential buildings, more trees were planted. As well, the footpath was added to connect the harbour with the main road.
Overall, the waterfront area of the Darwin town witnessed a dramatic change over the period from 2009 to 2014.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hout any change in location or in size. In contrast, the industrial area adjacent ...
^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...made way for the swimming pool in 2014. In addition, two swimming pools situated n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, so, still, well, another thing, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98443579767 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70713115679 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498054474708 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.2135766669 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0625 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.09268292683 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184482964691 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679836086275 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835466790396 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1742438959 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102299476741 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.