The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005.
The line graph provides a breakdown on the number of three different sorts of crime in England and Wales over the period from 1970 to 2005.
One of the first things to note is that from 1970 to 1990, there was approximately no street robbery in England and Wales. After 1990, this figure increased marginally and levelled off at 0.2 million till 2005.
According to the diagram, the figure for car theft in these countries stood at 0.4 million in 1970, which was twice as much as the amount of house burglary in this year. After this year, the figure increased considerably in 1980. Then, it climbed slightly to 1 million in 1980. Subsequently, it grew sharply and hit a peak at 1.6 million in 2995. After that, it decreased moderately and finished at 1 million in 2005.
As can be seen from the diagram, similar to the figure for car theft, the number of house burglary went up gradually until 1980. After that, it reached a plateau for five years at 0.6 million until 1985. Then, there was a minimal increase to 2005 in the amount of house burglary. Finally, this figure declined gradually to over 0.4 million in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es over the period from 1970 to 2005. One of the first things to note is that ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evelled off at 0.2 million till 2005. According to the diagram, the figure for...
^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tely and finished at 1 million in 2005. As can be seen from the diagram, similar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63184079602 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3997021341 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1958407678 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5833333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1720516159 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682998966983 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109477953603 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158109403026 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14978603269 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.