People should be responsible for the pollution problems caused by transportations, while others think the government should be held accountable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s world, most governments have shown great concern about the pollution problems caused by transportation. When this issue comes into view, there exists conflicting opinions. Some people think that individuals should take responsibility for this. Meanwhile, others are of the opinion that this is the duty of government. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.
On the one hand, some people support the view that citizens should be in charge of pollution problems which come from transportation. The most frequent factor contributed to this point is that in this day and age private vehicles released a large amount of exhaust fumes. According to a case survey which was conducted in Tehran in 2012, the average for the contribution of CO2 emission from private cars and motorbikes was 26372 and 1648 tons per day respectively. Obviously, this consequence arises from the private transportation used by people. Therefore, people should take responsibility for this pollution.
On the other hand, some argue that the government should be held accountable. One explanation to support this view is that a large sum of money needed to improve this phenomenon is not able to be paid by citizens. Consequently, the government should take charge of solving problems related to this pollution. This is shown by the following example. In 2017, Canada government provided over $182 million in funding for electric transportation and finding alternative fuels to reduce the amount of CO2 released from private vehicles. It is clear that this amount of money is not able to be paid by people or companies which requires government investment.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that solving the pollution problems is the task of both government and citizens. From my perspective, governments and citizens should take action together to deal with this phenomenon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, may, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33663366337 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06305477703 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518151815182 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2610310013 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323958340532 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114200900336 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885431493969 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215412182908 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309811939988 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.