Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead, they should spend the money on housing and road development. To what extent do you agree?
These days, most countries have shown great concern about issues related to building. Controversy exists as to whether governments should stop investing money in the restoration of ancient buildings to give more funds for constructing houses and improving the quality of roads. From my perspective, I am utterly convinced that money should be paid for the development of housing and roads rather than the reconstruction of old buildings.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this opinion is that in this day and age, many people all over the world face the risk of being homeless after disasters. This is shown by the following example. A ferocious explosion tore through the Lebanese capital on August 4 in 2020, damaging more than 70,000 houses and leaving some 300,000 homeless people. Therefore, it is obvious that the government should spend funds on rebuilding houses for citizens rather than repairing the old constructions.
In addition, another point to support this view is that the quality of roads closely attributed to the injury related to traffic accidents. One example to demonstrate this opinion is that in 2018, 63,194 people had died and 258,532 people had been wounded in traffic accidents in China, seeing a growth compared to the previous year. When looking into this problem, people found that the primary reason for this consequence was the unregulated road works and a lack of road facilities to control the vehicles stream. For this reason, if roads are not improved in the right way, the figure for fatality will continue increasing.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that the necessity of spending money on housing and road development is an undisputed necessity, which is much more essential than the renovation of the old buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...related to building. Controversy exists as to whether governments should stop investing money...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than repairing the old constructions. In addition, another point to support th...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or fatality will continue increasing. Given the aforementioned points, it may ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, therefore, as to, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20547945205 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79806047616 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8057373676 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252997907778 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861078838118 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831295659582 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159519996254 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666221197194 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.