Many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that good social skills is as important as good qualifications to succeed in job?
In today’s world, many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications is widespread. From my perspective, I totally agree with the statement that when employing people, good social skills are as essential as good qualifications to succeed in jobs.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this view is that good qualifications cannot ensure success in the real world of work in this day and age. To put it in another way, nowadays there are many students with high-level degree are not able to get a job. In reality, according to the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs, in 2017, the number of unemployed people with a bachelor’s degree stood at more than 200,000. As this example reveals, it is obvious that good qualifications are not adequate to help people to get jobs after their graduation.
In addition, one example to support this claim is that in the contemporary world, there are many jobs that require good social skills such as: market research, consult, human resources etc. In fact, this type of works requires people to work with diverse groups of people ranging from outside vendors to corporate executives. Therefore, it is clear that people who work in these fields have to acquire good social skills to operate their works.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that good social skills are indispensable for people to achieve success in their works. Consequently, the importance of good social skills is equivalent to good qualifications when applying for a job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In today’s world, many employers are emp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11240310078 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89069601136 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2229726065 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.604326689668 0.244688304435 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261158738861 0.084324248473 310% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196256714854 0.0667982634062 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.411117984163 0.151304729494 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190113769291 0.056905535591 334% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.