The charts below show one government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the percentage of government spending on the Arts and the figure for people taking part in Arts events in 1995 and 2005.
A cursory glance at the diagrams is enough to make it clear that throughout the given years, the number of people partaking in Arts Events saw an upward trend, except for the visual arts.
According to the pie charts, in 1995m the amount of money invested in visual arts accounted for nearly a quarter. However, in 2005, this amount halved. Meanwhile, there witnessed a slight increase in the percentage of the government’s fund spent on literature between 1995 and 2005, which was nearly 15%. Besides, in 1995, music occupied approximately half of the total amount of money the government allocated for the Arts. Nevertheless, this rate declined to more than a third in 2005. In contrast, the proportion of money paid on theatre by government underwent a dramatic growth from nearly a fifth to roughly 40%.
As can be seen from the bar chart, both in two given years, the number of people taking part in music events was the highest. To be more specific, there were over 100,000 people involving in music events in 1995. After this year, this number experienced a considerable increase and reached to 150,000 in 2005. On the contrary, in 1995, there were 50,000 people participating in visual art events in 1995. Subsequently, this figure decreased minimally in 2005. Another thing to add is that the figure for people joining in theatre as well as literature events undertook a margin escalation over the period from 1995 to 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-10 | lhm.ils | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Arman Mansyur | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Arman Mansyur | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Brian Sahar | 84 | view |
- Some people think that secondary or high school students should be taught money management because it is an important life skill Do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Many children participate in social networks on the Internet instead of participating in community activities in their neighbourhood What are the advantages and disadvantages of this situation 86
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 89
- People should be responsible for the pollution problems caused by transportations while others think the government should be held accountable Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, well, while, another thing, except for, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92537313433 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67425662083 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6626392611 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 5.23603664747 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251258492772 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910381726863 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625855261014 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167839530271 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635515784055 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, well, while, another thing, except for, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92537313433 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67425662083 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6626392611 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 5.23603664747 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251258492772 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910381726863 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625855261014 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167839530271 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635515784055 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.