People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption

Essay topics:

People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?

In today’s world, most countries show a great concern related to the number of sugary beverages used. It is a well-established fact that people are consuming more and more sweetened beverages. In this essay, an attempt will be made to investigate the factors which have resulted in this problem and put forward a variety of means to deal with this situation.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this issue is that in the contemporary world, the advertisements regarding soft-drinks are widespread. To put it in another way, the companies manufacturing beverages invest a large sum of money in advertising. Therefore, it is obvious that the advertisement of the soft drinks is pervasive in supermarkets, outlets, restaurants and so on. For that reason, people are more likely to be influenced by these advertisements. Hence, the consumption of sugary drinks will increase. One example to demonstrate this view is that Coca Cola spends the most global advertising and marketing than any other soft drink producer. To be more specific, this company averaged about $4 billion each year on advertising between 2015 and 2020. As a result, Coca Cola is by far the best-selling soda over the world, with the consuming amount going up annually. As this example reveals, the growth of sugar-based drinks consumed is attributed to their extensive advertisement.
Having identified the root of the problem, a good remedy to cope with is that the government should impose a tax on the products of soft-drinks. In fact, if the price of this kind of drink rises, the quantity of sugar-based drinks consumed will reduce. This is shown by the following example. In the United States, an analysis of the effect of the sugary drinks tax in Philadelphia found that the price of sugary drinks climbed by 1.6 cents per ounce was associated with a reduction of about 30% in the amount consumed by adults. Consequently, the government should take measures to tackle this problem.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that the escalation of the number of soft drinks consumed results from the prevalence of advertisements. In addition, this phenomenon could be improved by the policy in regard to tax on these products.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re specific, this company averaged about billion each year on advertising between...
^^
Line 2, column 723, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... specific, this company averaged about billion each year on advertising between 2015 a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icy in regard to tax on these products.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, kind of, as a result, in regard to, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1174863388 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09239530402 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5771675202 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5789473684 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304060187941 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968603624 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894110595404 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179650126225 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517750068953 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.