Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
One of the controversial questions is which areas of life should receive money from the government. Some people strongly agree with the opinion that money should be used to pay for communal vehicles. While others share the view that there are many issues which are much more important than transportation which should be paid for by the government. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.
On the one hand, some believe that the government should spend money on public transportation. One explanation to support this view is that the faster the public vehicles are, the more people choose to use them. That can reduce the level of exhaust fumes which are released into the atmosphere from vehicles. This is shown by the following example. A 2006 study by the Breakthrough Technologies Institute found that a bus rapid transit system in a medium-sized U.S city could reduce carbon dioxide emissions by more than 650,000 tons during a 20-year period. Therefore, it is obvious that public transportation is essential to invest in.
On the other hand, the opposers argue that it is much more important to spend on different problems, especially education. It is evident that if people do not have enough knowledge, they will be incapable of managing their lives. Hence, clearly, education is one of the most integral parts which mainly help people to expand their knowledge. However, according to the recent research published by Theirworld Organization, there are now 260 million children who are not able to go to primary or secondary school. Consequently, the government should invest more money in education to encourage children to attend school.
Take into account both these sets of arguments, there is abundant evidence to say that transportation is as important as different problems which need to be invested in by the government.
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the Sun Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- Because of modern technology it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give our opinion 89
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and deal with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 73
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Public celebrations national days festivals are held in many countries Some people say that these celebrations are a waste of money and we should spend money on more important things Do you agree or disagree Give your reasons and examples according to you 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'reduces'.
Suggestion: reduces
...ore people choose to use them. That can reduce the level of exhaust fumes which are re...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...apid transit system in a medium-sized U.S city could reduce carbon dioxide emissi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1606557377 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87982725153 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.99623309 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26337258876 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852073319697 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779307497942 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147204232444 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728263365917 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'reduces'.
Suggestion: reduces
...ore people choose to use them. That can reduce the level of exhaust fumes which are re...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...apid transit system in a medium-sized U.S city could reduce carbon dioxide emissi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1606557377 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87982725153 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.99623309 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26337258876 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852073319697 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779307497942 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147204232444 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728263365917 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.