Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high-level degrees Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, there is a public debate about the salary of people working in different fields. Some people think that people doing physical work should be paid the same as the people having a high-level degree. From my perspective, I remain unconvinced with this statement.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to my view is that physical work requires less training and education, whereas people with intellectual work have to spend a large amount of time studying to get their jobs. For this reason, if people doing physical work receive the same amount of wage with the people owning a high-level degree, the educational value will reduce in the future. That can lead to many negative aspects of education. In fact, in the US, a person has to allocate seven years of full-time studying after graduating high school to become an official lawyer. Meanwhile, a janitor usually does not need any formal higher education to find this job. As a result, it is unfair if a janitor can get the wage which is the same as a lawyer.
In addition, one explanation to support my point of view is that people with high level degree play an important role in our society because of the rare labour force in these fields. In reality, according to the statistics published in 2018 in the US, there were 310 prosthodontists. In the meantime, the number of construction workers was 7.2 million, which was much higher than the figure for prosthodontists. As this example reveals, due to the limited labour force to replace them, people with high-level degree have the right to get the higher salary compared with people doing physical work.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that people with high-level degree should be paid higher than people doing physical work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the US, there were 310 prosthodontists. In the meantime, the number of constructio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, whereas, while, as to, in addition, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92409240924 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68956447015 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6262820512 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464443165523 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161903945331 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195492497268 0.0667982634062 293% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361375898518 0.151304729494 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121219037631 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.