Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. To what extent do you agree?
In today’s world, most countries show a great concern related to the issues of the economy. It is thought that economic growth is the only way to eliminate world poverty. Nevertheless, others share the view that the development of the economy will result in environmental damage. Therefore, it should be stopped in the future. From my perspective, I remain unconvinced by this claim.
To begin with, the most frequent factor to argue this view is that economic growth helps to resolve most serious social problems such as poverty, unemployment, healthcare, social conflict and so forth. One example to demonstrate this view is that in South Africa, Australia and Canada, a 1 per cent increase in GDP is matched by an increase in employment of 0.6 per cent or higher. As this example suggests, it is undisputed that economic growth can deal with a large number of issues regarding human beings. As a result, it cannot be stopped in the future.
In addition, one explanation against this point of view might be that the growth of the economy is not necessarily destroying the environment. This is shown by the following example. Statistics in economic development indicates that in 2018, Singapore's GDP per capita is ranked 3rd in the world. Meanwhile, this country is also considered as the cleanest city in the world by a multitude of experts these days. Take this country as an example, it cannot be denied that the development of the economy is not always attributed to the destruction of the environment. Besides, there are myriad ways to both boost the economic growth and protect the environment as Singapore did.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that economic growth should not be halted due to its benefits to solve several social problems. Moreover, it is feasible to find a way to increase the development of the economy and improve the environment at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...uted that economic growth can deal with a large number of issues regarding human beings. As a res...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96238244514 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90010502783 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4055161809 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1176470588 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204093775835 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721301005935 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07753215245 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137091692842 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341597634463 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.