The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line graph provides a breakdown on the birth rates of China and the USA over the period from 1920 to 2000.
A cursory glance at the diagram is enough to make it clear that the birth rates in China and the USA saw a significant decrease throughout the period shown.
According to the chart, China’s birth rate in 1920 was 10%. After that, this figure slightly increased to approximately 20% in 1935 then fall again to 10% in 1930. Following that, this number considerably rose to exactly 15% in 1935. However, this figure witnessed a substantial fall to 5% in 1940 then it levelled off at this point until 1945. Nonetheless, after this period, it sharply ascended and reached the highest point at 20% in 1950. Finally, this number rapidly declined to nearly 20% in 2000.
As can be seen from the diagram, the maternity rate in the USA and China had the same trend during the period from 1920 to 1930, both at about 10%. Nevertheless, this figure slightly fluctuated around 11% until 1940. Thereafter, there was a dramatic drop in the rate of birth in the USA to less than 5% in 1945. In addition, it experienced a rapid climb to 15% in 1950. Throughout the remainder of the period. This number fell gradually to nearly 7% in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59009009009 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52094947735 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4745543548 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7857142857 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244412644034 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932413734226 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12424008625 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214166842036 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124523644475 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.