Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists rather than locals people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places

Essay topics:

Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists rather than locals people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?

In today’s world, the majority of people who visit museums and historical sites are foreign tourists instead of locals. In this essay, an attempt will be made to explain the factors which have contributed to this problem, and also put forward solutions on how to entice locals to visit museums and historical sites more often.
The most frequent cause for this issue is the little interests in historical sites from local residents. This is because they find it unnecessary to visit these places another time after already visiting in the past. Moreover, the information about these locations or historical samples can be easily searched on the Internet. Therefore, domestic tourists do not prefer dropping into this type of site. Another reason which is responsible for this phenomenon is that the foreigners are curious about the history of other countries. As a result, they usually decide to visit museums or historical locations when going abroad. This is shown by the following example. When being asked about which places to go to, a Canadian boy selected Quang Ninh museums to learn about Vietnamese history. Meanwhile, the Vietnamese chose a theme park because of feeling boring when visiting museums which he had known about.
The authorities must take actions to tackle this problem. They should encourage domestic tourists to visit historical sites more often by offering them some discount. This is because the cheaper the cost of an excursion is, more people will participate in it. In addition, schools should organize some visiting tours as extracurricular activities for students. If authorities and schools do not take measures soon, this problem will not be improved.
In conclusion, there are indeed various issue regarding this phenomenon, yet, they can be solved by these aforementioned measures.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29655172414 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71586697255 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6095372579 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3529411765 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370411840585 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113112605016 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657209309891 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220374127718 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855473793947 0.056905535591 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.