Compare the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800, 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrate the transformation of the town of Brindell and local areas in three different years: 1800, 1900 and 2000.
One noticeable thing to note from the diagrams is that the Woodland area located on the northeast corner of the maps was smaller over the time period.
According to the maps, the Brindell town situated on the southwest side was expanded over the period from 1800 to 2000. Moreover, toward the east of the Brindell town, the farmland area for animals was also enlarged throughout the period shown. Furthermore, in this area, Bun Hill and villages from workers have been built up in 1900, then widened in 2000. Simultaneously, in 1900, there were many industries added. In addition, more industries were constructed in 2000.
As can be seen from the diagrams, to the northwest side, the farmland for crops remained unchanged between 1800 and 2000. However, in 2000, there was a Bun Hill park erected on the original site of woodland, which made the woodland area reduce in size.
Another thing to add is that the River Stour situated between the woodland area and farmland for animals in 1800 still stayed the same after the change from 1800 to 2000.
Overall, the town of Brindell and local areas witnessed a dramatic change over the period of time from 1800 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...as witnessed a dramatic change over the period of time from 1800 to 2000.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, another thing, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85135135135 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46659773264 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5850444831 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9090909091 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250275522298 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113766696686 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080538390329 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159236369397 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921529702015 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.