Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, most countries have shown great concern about environmental problems. Controversy exists as to whether raising the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is the best way to deal with the problems related to the environment. From my point of view, I strongly suspect that this is not the most suitable method which can be used to improve the environment.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that increasing the fuel price can reduce the amount of exhaust fume. One example to support this point is that according to the statistics published recently on CJES, in Iran, an average 1% higher actual price of fuel will reduce carbon emission by 0.14%. This figure is estimated to continue going down in the next year. Therefore, the benefit of this method is undisputed.
On the other hand, one compelling argumentative against this opinion is that raising the price of fuel raises many objections of citizens. This is shown by the following example. In 2019, after the current French president Emmanuel Macron, together with his government, introduced a series of taxes which hit petrol with a stark price increase, Paris was engulfed by the initial outcry of dismay with public areas being set alight by demonstrators. That led to blockades, violence and even fatalities which made the French government eventually revoke their policy and make the old fuel price come back. As a result, it is obvious that the escalation of fuel cost has sparked many protests of the general public.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that to some extent, increasing fuel price has good solutions for the problems regarding the environment, especially exhaust fume emissions. However, it also brings some negative impacts to the public. Overall I wholly disagree with this measure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In today’s world, most countries have sh...
^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ironmental problems. Controversy exists as to whether raising the cost of fuel for cars and o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 698, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...l cost has sparked many protests of the general public. Given the aforementioned points, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, regarding, so, therefore, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08053691275 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70801834595 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0067368532 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219673433947 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687398844263 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907468168374 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139378145557 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704554918939 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.