Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, there is a public debate about the study of children. It is believed that every child should be taught to play a musical instrument by several educationalists. From my perspective, I am utterly convinced that children should be educated to play a musical instrument.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this statement is that learning an instrument can bring many good aspects to the development of the brain. One example to demonstrate this statement is that neuroscientists at USC recently carried out a study examining the impact of music instruction on children’s social, emotional and cognitive development. The study results show that music instrument-learning speeds up the growth of the auditory pathway in the brain and increases its efficiency. As the example reveals, an instrument accelerates brain development.
In addition, one explanation to support this view is that playing instruments could lead to many good sides when they mature. To put it in another way, learning how to play an instrument as a child could result in the better listening skill when becoming an adult. This is shown by the following example. According to the study published in the Journal of Neuroscience, researchers found that just one to five years of experience playing music as a child was associated with an improved cognitive ability in processing complex sounds as a young adult. Therefore, learning to play a musical instrument could bring merits in the future of children.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that children should be taught how to play a musical instrument because of the benefits it brings to their lives. Consequently, I totally agree with this statement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, may, so, therefore, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25539568345 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21010265731 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543165467626 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6790552684 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272494299489 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105324087985 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110357784785 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198463200648 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951041120052 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.