The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand overa 25 year period from 1980 to 2005

The pictures describe the development that occurred in Youngsville in New Zealand from 1980 to 2005. Overall, this city experienced a number of dramatic changes, the most significant of which was the complete disappearance of woodland and houses. Additionally, there were the stadium construction and the railway station's expansion.
In the North of River Alanah, while the hospital has remained, a new park was constructed at the expense of the green area. There was a stadium to the West of the lake where had been a vacant space in 1980. The railway station was extended to the North after the demolition of the residential area and there is a Marina was built near the rail bridge.
In the South of the river, the school near the river bank were retained after 25 years but the trees and houses were completely cleared to make the way for factories and warehouse. In the South West corner of Youngsville, the airport and parking facility still exist. The woodland around them, however, was cut down for industrial purposes. Moreover, in 2005, skyscrapers were established where there had been only small houses and trees.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding woodland'?
Suggestion: The surrounding woodland
...rport and parking facility still exist. The woodland around them, however, was cut down for industrial p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97883597884 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72890746931 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3592565864 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112150329851 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485012549002 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918019116184 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804299526353 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538222145551 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.