A number of ex-prisoners can become the ordinary people then dedicate to society. It is undeniable that employing such individuals in educating teenagers how dangerous perpetrating a crime is, in most cases, would be the most effective way.
Given that most teeners normally have a tendency to rely on the story which related by its principal characters, allowing people who used to be in prison to speak to adolescents their experiences would engage auditors’ attention in the offenders’ criminal records. The present point draws on the report from “Anti-juvenile crime campaign” in 2021, which showed that the lecture on delinquents’ criminal processes and rehabilitations was actually influential in warning persons aged between 13 and 19 years in the fearful punishment of breaking the law. As a consequence, juveniles would be aware of the crime prevention’s significance and turn into law-abiding citizens. Granted, some people might assume that young adults, in some circumstances, idolize and be interested in illegal activities, hence, they could imitate these antisocial behaviors. For example, my friend’s brother Henry, who is believed that he got in trouble, specifically hit his classmates considering the criminal covetousness after hearing felonious narratives. However, even in this case, I would say that aforementioned educating method merely be a trivial influential way. Were it not to execute, the young who have ruthless essences, could have been effected by violent movies or televised violence.
The alternatives to employ reformed lawbreakers on educate youths about crime would be far less effective. One option would be for police officers to train teen-agers as the law. That could be useful to tell them about what happens to the wrongdoers when they are caught; nonetheless, juveniles, sometimes, are reluctant to receive the advices from polices. A second option would be for educational films to be informative, but there could be no chances for young people to interact and ask questions. To exemplify these points, I, a secondary student, find it not enjoyable to hear the humdrum law theory from polices, parents, or teachers.
In conclusion, for reasons mentioned above, I totally believe that using ex-prisoners to talk to teenagers about the dangers of turning to crime is the optimum way to educate youngsters about the crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A number of ex-prisoners can become the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ases, would be the most effective way. Given that most teeners normally have a ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...violent movies or televised violence. The alternatives to employ reformed lawb...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y from polices, parents, or teachers. In conclusion, for reasons mentioned abo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46070460705 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14729251351 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626016260163 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6595600233 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174203860243 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588540976693 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483364061832 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117426091755 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338057039066 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.